Ministering to the Poor

Interview 3 Comments

How do we respond to our fellow humans in need? For David Breitzmann, it starts with the understanding that they are us.

Is QuakerSpeak worth $1 a video?

Comments 3

  1. jules

    City & State
    like looking into someone elses mirror and seeing “yourself”.

  2. Ray Regan

    City & State

    I agree with your confident, intellectual articulation. They’re sound ideas we need to be aware of. We are all the same. But as I watched the video I waited to hear what actions you and San Francisco Friends were doing to help the spill-over people from the Tenderloin, what ministries you worked on…and then the video ended.

    Talking, understanding, getting to know poor folks “honesty” isn’t going to fill their belly or get them the mental health help they need.

    We Quakers are good with words, our values and intentions are wholesome, and are recognized for that. We strive to save the world, the environment, governing legislation. Which is all good, needs to be done and it feels good.

    Can we do more, however, to help people in-need near our Meetinghouse door, in our local communities with actional, “boots on the ground” aid?

    (Maybe you have active ministries out in the community helping people?)

  3. Bob Barns

    City & State
    Beaverton, Oregon
    After 23 years with AVP and 31 countries in my folder I find that it is inappropriate to use the phrase “ministering to the poor”. I have found that we can, and do, minister to each other. Let us the phrase, please, “ministering with each other.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *